« Clap Three Times | Main | The Evolution of Security »
February 04, 2008Free Flowing at MPI
Posted by Will Ng
Responses (2)
There are lots of discussion at MPI about a new format they are calling "Cafes." Here's the gist: Meeting participants are able to direct their own meeting content by posting a topic on a whiteboard, getting a table number, and waiting to see who shows up to discuss. If you think that sounds crazy, you're not the only one.
I'm pretty open to new ideas, so I participated this morning on the following topic: How do you run high-end incentives with an awareness of corporate social responsibility? The person who proposed the question was not an expert on the topic and neither were any of the participants who showed up for the discussion. In going through their own struggles and challenges, however, the seven participants at my table were able to connect with each other around a shared interest, provide lots of food for thought, and give some ideas about next steps to take to achieve some basic social responsibility when it comes to incentive programs, which are usually known for their extravagance.
Some ideas that came out of the discussion were how to reduce some waste (most specifically, bottled water), incorporating charitable activities (suggestions about specific suppliers to use), and using hotels and resorts that have conservation programs in place.
These are all basic ideas, and good ones, but they came out in the first 30 minutes of the discussion. The second 30 minutes, which should have taken our thought processes further, meandered to a discussion about the new format itself, technology adoption, and other topics that had nothing to do with the original subject. While I like the format and the ability to define your own content for a meeting program, I wonder if there is some way to direct participants a little bit more about how to moderate a group conversation to take it beyond what's already been said and push it towards more innovative thinking and problem solving.
I think we had some good brains around the table, but we lacked techniques to take our conversation to the next level. That's what a good moderator can do, but how can those techniques be incorporated into such an extemporaneous format?
—Blog by Elizabeth West, on location at the 2008 Professional Education Conference, in Houston.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5cc553ef00e550297a198834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Free Flowing at MPI:
Comments
Good point -- I heard of several groups in the same situation. Perhaps one alternative is to post a question that you have some background in, rather than one you need answered. I posed a question in my area of expertise (trade shows) and several planners (whose meetings include trade shows) joined our conversation. While we didn't stay strictly on the original question, we did discuss issues within the realm of trade show production.
Posted by: Marlys Arnold | Feb 12, 2008 3:05:41 PM
I agree that that is one solution. But when I pay to go to a conference, I usually do so to learn something I didn't already know rather than to teach others.
I do think you can accomplish this in peer groups, but it takes a certain mix of the "right" peers. As the leader of the group, did you take away valuable information or perspectives that you could use to do your job better? If so, how did that come about?
Thanks for your response!
Posted by: Elizabeth West | Feb 12, 2008 3:18:15 PM
Respond to article (2)

